September 16, 2011
By David J. Cook
The Free Press – Volume 10, Summer 2011
Published by the Commercial Law League of America
The crucible of every judgment is enforcement, compelling the judgment debtor to involuntarily compensate the plaintiff. Absent insurance or a solvent defendant, judgments do not reach a flash point until the debtor sells valuable property encumbered by a judgment lien, or confronted by aggressive and successful campaign of civil enforcement.
View the complete article here…
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
September 12, 2011
This ruling demonstrates that a judgment creditor is generally entitled to use the power of a subpoena to marshal financial records at a debtors exam. This is important in enabling the judgment creditor to meaningfully examine the judgment debtor with bank statements, and financial statements at hand.
Read the full opinion here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
September 12, 2011
Arbitration benefits litigants by offering finality. As the California Court of Appeal held in Sappal v. Business Investment Management, absent the most extreme ruling, an arbitrators decision is not subject to judicial review.
Why is this important? Winners like arbitration as they offer finality, assuming they got what they wanted. Losers abhor arbitration, as they offer finality, assuming that they are disappointed with the result.
Read the full opinion here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
August 29, 2011
In Kraus-Anderson Capital v. Alamo Medical Supply & Equipment, Inc. the California Court of Appeal (2nd Dist.) upheld a trial court’s finding that the Minnesota Courts had the jurisdiction to enforce a promisory note executed in California.
The facts here are typical of many finance transactions. An out of state financier lends money to a customer of expensive, specialized equipment. The customer executes a promisory note and security agreement. The vendor executes a remarketing agrement obligating the vendor to recover the collateral and provide for remarketing, a common mechanism facilitating the sale of specialized equipment.
The customer in this case defaulted, and the financier sought to recover its collateral and call upon the vendor to re-market the equipment. The financier then discovered that the equipment was misrepresented and that the vendor defaulted on the remarketing agreement. The financier obtained a judgment in its home state (Minn.) against the vendor for the fraudulent equipment and the breach of the remarketing agreement. The financier then sought to domesticate the sister-state judgment in California, prompting the vendor to challenge the judgment on jurisdictional grounds. The California trial court denied the motion and the Court of Appeal affirmed.
In a scholarly analysis the appellate court found that the sister-state court properly had jurisdiction over the vendor.
The message from this case is that a financier is entitled to seek relief in its home court given a breach of a remarketing agreement by an out of state vendor.
Read the full opinion here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
August 3, 2011
Originally published in Commercial Law World, July/August 2011, Volume 28 | Issue 3
By David J. Cook
Chapter 11 confirmed plans are born, live and die of old age. This article explains how Chapter 11 plans, like any other federal judgment, can expire.
Read the complete article here.
Leave a Comment » |
Bankruptcy |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
June 24, 2011
Los Angeles Lawyer – April 2011
By David J. Cook
THE RACE TO ENFORCEMENT begins as soon as a judgment creditor wins a lawsuit. While typically the plaintiff, a judgment creditor can also be the defendant in an anti-SLAPP suit. In either situation, the judgment creditor can begin enforcement procedures immediately upon entry of judgment and can go so far as to direct the sheriff to appear at the defendant’s front door, break it down, and seize the contents from ?oor to ceiling, including the family dog. Only settlement, posting of an expensive appeal bond, or entry of a discretionary stay of enforcement by the trial court can prevent enforcement…
Continue reading the full article here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
June 24, 2011
Debt3 May/June 2011
By David J. Cook
How can the internet identify the liable party, describe its status and offer up new remedies? You are a self-selecting audience. What does this mean to you?
Read the full article here.
Leave a Comment » |
Asset Protection |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
June 10, 2011
A quick hypothetical: A debtor isn’t paying. You’ve unleashed your full arsenal of enforcement allowed under the law, bank levies, a motion for the appointment of a receiver, motion for sale of a dwelling house, etc. The whole gamut.
Everything is going along well enough, until your fax machine coughs out a friendly notice from your local bankruptcy court that your debtor filed Chapter 13.
That’s funny, you were sure that your debtor had deep pockets. Bankruptcy? This debtor could write you a check tomorrow if he weren’t still bitter that you had the sheriff sell his Lamborghini. No, this time it’s personal. Your debtor just doesn’t want to pay.
Your debtor then sets forth a plan which purports to pay his creditors (You) 100 cents on the dollar, but in monthly payments spread out over 5 years and with no interest. This doesn’t sound appealing at all.
The court in the case of In re Steven Allan Korn (CAEB, Case No: 11-91339) rejected precisely such a plan, finding that when bankruptcy is filed for the sole purpose of frustrating the enforcement attempts of a single creditor the filing was in bad faith.
Read the full opinion here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
May 31, 2011
In the case of Garza v. ACL the judgment creditors sought to obtain a corporate debtor's financial records through a subpoena targeted at the debtor's attorneys. In answering the question of "Are canceled checks protected by attorney client privilege?" the court, Hon. John K. Stewart, Judge Presiding, answered with a resounding No.
“THE COURT: I think the difference is that a check or a money transfer, these have lives of their own. They are not communications. They are instruments of commerce. They are negotiable instruments. A letter accompanying a check would be a communication, but a check is really a communication to a bank. It’s telling the bank to pay a certain amount of money on behalf of a client. So I think the Harris analysis, to me, is the most appropriate and on point. And that’s the Ninth Circuit Court of California — Ninth Circuit Court in California. It’s 413 F.2d 316. But they say, and they are quoting another case, but they say “The canceled checks and bank statements are not within the attorney-client privilege. These items were negotiable instruments in commerce and were never confidential from the time of their creation.Their transfer from the client to the attorney did not constitute a confidential communication.”In those cases, they were trying to subpoena those records from a bank.And again, if those documents ultimately end up in a bank, and they do, when the check comes into your firm, you endorse it, and it goes back to the bank. The original sometimes is referred to the person who signed the check. Now, for example, my own bank account, I get little microfiche reprints and the originals are either in my bank or else they are kept on microfiche somewhere. But they are ultimately in the bank.”
(See attached transcript, Pg. 13)
Read the full transcript here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
May 17, 2011
CARPENTER & ZUCKERMAN et al., v. PAUL COHEN et al.,
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.
Filed May 10, 2011.
The trial court in granting defendants’ request to strike plaintiffs’ memorandum of costs seeking attorney fees incurred as the prevailing parties in a prior appeal, a law firm and its two partners, by using an associate in the law firm, had, in effect, represented themselves in the prior appeal. In this appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in granting the motion to tax costs because the attorney who represented them on appeal was not a partner and otherwise had no financial interest in their law firm. Also, plaintiffs contend that, even if the law firm plaintiff cannot recover fees for the legal services of the associate, the individual plaintiffs can recover fees attributable to that associate’s services rendered on their behalf.
In affirming the order denying plaintiffs’ request for attorney fees for services rendered by the associate to the firm and its partners, we hold that (1) substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the attorney who represented plaintiffs in the prior appeal was doing so as an associate of the law firm and not as an independent contractor, and, therefore, plaintiffs legally are not entitled to an award of attorney fees; and (2) the trial court was justified in concluding that based on the record, the individual plaintiffs could not recover attorney fees in connection with the appeal because there was no showing of any distinction between the cross-claims against the law firm plaintiff and those against the individual plaintiffs.
Read the full opinion here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
May 2, 2011
Pratt’s Journal of Bankruptcy Law May/June 2011
By David J. Cook
This article discusses post judgment strategies to reach the assets of uncooperative, distant, or reclusive judgment debtors.
Read the full article here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
May 2, 2011
Debt3 March/April 2011
By David Cook
Ray Charles taught us disentitlement: “Hit the road, Jack, and don’t you come back no more, no more, no more, no more.” Disentitlement offers the nuclear remedy to compel payment, if possible, from the recalcitrant debtor — and, like “Jack” in Ray Charles’ wonderful song, hits the road. This article is a primer on civil disentitlement.
Read the full article here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
May 2, 2011
Los Angeles Lawyer, April 2011
by David J. Cook
The race to enforcement begins as soon as a judgment creditor wins a lawsuit. While typically the plaintiff, a judgment creditor can also be the defendant in an anti-SLAPP suit. In either situation, the judgment creditor can begin enforcement procedures immediately upon entry of judgment and can go so far as to direct the sheriff to appear at the defendant’s front door, break it down, and seize the contents from floor to ceiling, including the family dog. Only settlement, posting of an expensive appeal bond, or entry of a discretionary stay of enforcement by the trial court can prevent enforcement.
Continue reading the full article here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
April 12, 2011
In the case of J & J Sports Productions v. Jorge Alberto, et al., 2011 WL 1134265 the judgment creditor received a judgment against the owner of a bar who had broadcast a pay per view boxing match without authorization.
When the bar owner refused to pay the judgment, the judgment creditor moved for the appointment of a receiver of the bar’s liquor license which was granted.
Read the order here.
Leave a Comment » |
Creditor's Rights and Remedies |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
March 16, 2011
Originally published in Debt3, Vol. 26, Issue No. 1, January/February 2011
Knock-off, counterfeit items, forgeries and fakes can be found everywhere from New York City alleyways to online stores. How can the law help manufacturers fight back?
View the article here.
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
February 18, 2011
These three appellate opinions depict the classic story of a plaintiff enjoying victory in a civil proceeding, only to but find recovery illusory. The plaintiff files a fraudulent conveyance action and scores a money judgment against the conveyee. However, the fraudulent conveyee declines payment.
When pressed for payment the fraudulent conveyee files Chapter 7. Claiming that she was the victim of wrongful conduct, the plaintiff files an action to exempt the debt from the discharge under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(6) [willful and malicious conduct].
The victim however, runs out of luck and loses.
The first appellate opinion describes her victory against the landlord.
LUC v CHIU 3/30/2001
The second appellate opinion describes her victory against the conveyee.
LUC v CHIEN 10/28/2003
The third appellate opinion describes the conveyee’s victory in securing a discharge of the debt.
LUC v CHIEN 2/7/2008
Leave a Comment » |
Bankruptcy, Fraudulent Conveyances |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
February 4, 2011
Credit applications which merge credit terms and a personal guarantee are frought with ambiguities and the potential for judicial scrutiny. In this case the credit application failed to carefully lay out the terms of the guarantee which would be borne by the individual who signed on behalf of his company. The district court found that the credit application lacked the specificity and the language to denote a guarantee and therefor enter judgment in favor of the individual on the guarantee itself. However, the facts of the case suggested an ostensible basis for liability by way of alter ego and other equitable claims. These claims kept the individual in as a viable defendant. This case is important in discussing the prerequisites for a guarantee and also a summary analysis of alter ego law in California and Virginia.
View the court’s opinion here
Leave a Comment » |
Personal Guarantees |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
February 4, 2011
The Rubin family levied upon the antiquities collection owned by Iran in the hands of the Oriental institute of the University of Chicago. The Peterson plaintiffs survivors and family members of the marine barracks bombing successfully intervened. As of February 2011, the seventh circuit is considering jurisdictional challenges.
View the minute order here
Leave a Comment » |
FSIA, International Enforcement of Judgments, Orders, Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
February 4, 2011
Prior to the filing of his bankruptcy, the debtor conveyed his residence to his parents. This conveyance apparently constituted a fraudulent conveyance. The debtor claimed the property as exempt in order to protect some of the equity. Bankruptcy Code Sec. 522(g) bars a debtor from exempting property which was fraudulently conveyed. This case is important in illustrating the dire risks of any type of asset protection strategy.
View the order here
Leave a Comment » |
Bankruptcy, Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
February 4, 2011
Enforcement of judgments in federal court compels the judgment creditor to take many steps in order to engage the marshal or a process server. Many marshals decline service of a garnishment and instruct the judgment creditor to use a process server. The practice in most districts is that the judgment creditor must obtain an order from the district court authorizing the process server to serve the enforcement. This is a requirement in several districts of California.
View the order here
Leave a Comment » |
Orders, Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
February 4, 2011
While foreign sovereigns are generally immune from falling under the jurisdiction of US courts, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) provides that state sponsors of terrorism are no longer protected from being sued in US courts if certain conditions are met.
Once a court acquires jurisdiction over a foreign sovereign, it also has jurisdiction to compel compliance with its orders. In the case of Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran, the judgment creditors sought post judgment discovery responses from Iran to aid in the collection of a $2.7 Billion judgment. Iran failed to respond to the discovery requests, and the court entered an order compelling discovery.
View the order here
Citation: 2008 WL 8216327
Leave a Comment » |
Creditor's Rights and Remedies, FSIA, International Enforcement of Judgments, Offshore Enforcement |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
January 27, 2011
Financial Fraud Law Report, February 2011
By David J. Cook
There are numerous irregularities in financial records that can be the touchstones of financial fraud.
View the full article here.
Leave a Comment » |
Financial Statements, Fraud |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
January 26, 2011
When faced with a judgment debtor who is a defendant in multiple cases, there is a high probability that they have turned over significant funds to their attorneys from which to pay out settlements in the various matters.
Such was the case with Asbestos Corporation Limited (ACL), a Canadian corporation that is frequently sued in the United States for personal injuries related to, you guessed it, asbestos.
Believing that ACL had deposited significant funds with the Pennsylvania law firm of Goldfein & Joseph, the judgment creditors obtained an assignment order which then allowed them to seek a turnover of funds held by the judgment debtor’s attorneys.
View the assignment order here
Leave a Comment » |
Assignment of Rights, Creditor's Rights and Remedies, International Enforcement of Judgments, Offshore Enforcement, Orders |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
January 26, 2011
In the case of Garza v. Asbestos Corporation Limited, the judgment creditors faced the uphill battle of collecting against a judgment debtor located in Canada.
When the judgment debtor (ACL) failed to respond to post-judgment discovery, the judgment creditors moved to have ACL disentitled from responding to any further motions in the case.
The basis of the disentitlement was the simple notion that if a party avails itself to the courts they must play by the rules. A party who is in contempt cannot participate in further proceedings until they comply with the court’s orders.
View the disentitlement order here
Leave a Comment » |
Disentitlement, International Enforcement of Judgments, Offshore Enforcement, Orders |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 29, 2010
Pratt’s Journal of Bankruptcy Law: Volume 7 – Number 1 – January 2011
By David J. Cook
Are confirmed Chapter 11 plans of reorganization immortal or do they have an expiration date like any other federal district court judgment? This article will answer this question and will conclude that a Chapter 11 confirmed plan — the order confirming the plan — is not immortal. A confirmed plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 requiring the payment of money is a federal money judgment and therefore subject to the requirements of state statutory renewal similar to any federal or state money judgment based on the law of the domicile where the district or bankruptcy court is sited. Confirmed plans expire like any other federal or state money judgment. Upon expiration of the confirmed plan and depending upon the renewal statutory scheme of the domicile state statute, the debtor is discharged of all continuing obligations under the plan including obligations to pay creditors directly or a trust established by a the plan for benefit of creditors.
Read the Full Article Here
Leave a Comment » |
Bankruptcy |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
In City of San Francisco v. Esmas, the City of San Francisco faced the uphill task of unwinding multiple fraudulent conveyances.
After the city obtained a judgment against the defendants for running an illegal “flophouse”, the defendants transferred the property through a series of transactions which left the chain of title hopelessly tangled.
The following documents provide insight into the multiple steps used by the city to unwind the fraudulent conveyances and sell the property free and clear of the debtors’ interest.
First, the city obtained a Restraining Order. Next a receiver was appointed. The receiver was then able to sell the property. The Sheriff Sale Order, as well as the Order Allowing Access to Property, Second Restraining Order, and Amended Sale Order can be viewed by clicking on the preceding links.
Ultimately the fraudulent conveyees appealed the order. You can view the Appellate Decision here.
This case provides the reader with a narrative commencing from the first restraining order to the appellate decision, which is a rarity in fraudulent conveyances. The seminal aspect of this case is that the trial court vacated six separate post judgment transfers in a post judgment trial. The court found that the debtor had made a series of fraudulent conveyances and vacated all of them .
Leave a Comment » |
Fraudulent Conveyances, Orders |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
Assignment orders can be a useful method of collecting assets which are located outside of a court’s immediate jurisdiction. In two recent decisions federal courts held that once the court obtains jurisdiction over a defendant, the court has jurisdiction over property of the defendant located out of state.
In UMG Recordings v. BCD Music Group a judgment creditor sought an assignment of the right to receive payments from third parties, some of whom were located out of state, to aid in the recovery of a $7.2 million judgment. The court in UMG held that “When a court has personal jurisdiction over an individual defendant, it also has jurisdiction over the defendant’s property.”
In
Global Money Management v. Steven B. McDonnald, the judgment debtor opposed a motion for assignment of rights concerning property located out of state. Citing
UMG v. BCD,
supra, the court found that “Because the Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant in this matter, the Court has “the power to affect out-of-state property by means of decree, based on personal jurisdiction over the parties, which determines the parties’ personal rights or equities in that property.”
Read the full opinion here.
Leave a Comment » |
Assignment of Rights, Orders |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
On October 23, 1983, 241 U.S. Servicemen serving as civilian peace keepers in Beirut, Lebanon were killed when two converted water tankers loaded with explosives were detonated next two the barracks where the servicemen slept. This attack was the single deadliest terror attack on American citizens prior to 9/11.
The attack was perpetrated by the terrorist organization Hezbollah and funded by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The families of the victims of this attack eventually obtained a $2.6 billion judgment against Iran for its involvement in the attacks.
The families of the victims sought to collect their judgment by levying on the shipping companies which conducted business with Iran. In response to these levies, the shipping companies raised the sovereign immunity of Iran as a shield to not comply.
The trial court found that rather than being an affirmative defense which could only be raised by Iran, the issue of sovereign immunity could be raised sua sponte by the court.
In a 2-1 decision, The 9th Circuit upheld the decision of the trial court. Read the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision Here
Leave a Comment » |
FSIA, Offshore Enforcement |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
Assignment orders are one method of reaching monies which are owed to the judgment debtor by third parties.
Below are two assignment orders, the first order is a general assignment of all rights to payment owed to the judgment debtor. This order can be sent to third parties along with a “Pay me, not them letter”. An additional advantage to assignment orders is that they can be sent to third parties without the need of being formally served by a process server or sheriff. These orders can be sent out by mail, fax, or even email, meaning that there are much less cost prohibitive. The second order specifically reaches funds held by factors.
General Assignment Order
Further Assignment Order Reaching Funds Held By Factors
The successful use of an assignment order can often lead to settlement.
Leave a Comment » |
Assignment of Rights, Orders |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
While refusing to pay the civil judgment entered against him, O.J. Simpson was seen sporting a suspiciously expensive looking Rolex watch. The Goldman family then moved for a turnover order.
View the order here
In the end the watch turned out to be a fake, but let this be a warning to judgment debtors: it is unwise to flaunt seizable assets .
Leave a Comment » |
O.J. Simpson |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
When O.J. Simpson broke into the Las Vegas Hotel Room, he famously declared “Think you can steal my [expletive] and sell it?”
The most important part of that phrase is the word “my”. If the sports memorabilia truly was Simpson’s, and had value, it could be sold to satisfy the judgment.
The Goldman family first attempted to seize the memorabilia via ex parte motion. This application failed, and you can read the Order denying ex parte application for turnover order here.
However a second application was successful. View the turnover order here.
Leave a Comment » |
O.J. Simpson |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
In August 2007, the video game publisher Take-Two Interactive chose to feature O.J. Simpson in it’s video game All-Pro Football 2K8. A trailer for the video game can be viewed here.
Simpson allegedly received $50,000 for his participation in the game, however the court subsequently ordered the money to be turned over to the Goldman family.
View the Court’s Order Here
View the Order Granting Assignment and Turnover of the Video Game Rights
Leave a Comment » |
O.J. Simpson |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
Originally published in The Credit and Financial Management Review, First Quarter 1996, Volume 2, Number 1
A Q & A by David J. Cook.
Several questions are answered regarding guarantees, inferior products, personal guarantees, and preferences are answered.
Read the Full Article Here
Leave a Comment » |
Creditor's Rights and Remedies |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
Originally Published in Commercial Law Bulletin May/June 1995
By David J. Cook
A primer on stemming the tide of employee theft.
Read the Full Article Here
Leave a Comment » |
Fraud, Law Practice Management |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
Originally published in Commercial Law Bulletin November/December 1995
Dealing with fraudulent conveyances can be frustrating to say the least. This article demystifies the most common debtor strategies and provides a road map to recovery.
Read the Full Article Here
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
Originally Published in Commercial Law Bulletin November/December 1996
By David J. Cook
Super Glue is great stuff. Super Glue repairs china, leather, plastic and metal… The Uniform Commercial Code likewise dispenses an invisible Super Glue, which welds together a deal.
Read the Full Article Here
Leave a Comment » |
U.C.C. |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
Originally published in – Commercial Law Bulletin January/February 1998
By David J. Cook
A debtor’s financial statements are a great resource to aid in the collecting of a debt.
Read the Full Article Here
Leave a Comment » |
Creditor's Rights and Remedies, Financial Statements |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 20, 2010
Originally published: Commercial Law Bulletin, November/December 1998
By David J. Cook
While a mutually agreed upon settlement can leave both parties in a position to leave a dispute behind and move on, an ill-conceived or poorly drafted settlement can leave one party significantly worse off. This article discusses some of the common pitfalls awaiting the parties to a settlement agreement.
Read the Full Article Here
Leave a Comment » |
Settlement |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 17, 2010
The rights to the If I Did It Book were in the hands of Lorraine Brooke Associates, Inc. (LBA), a shell corporation which was in bankruptcy. In order to obtain the rights the Goldman family had to pierce the corporate veil an seek an order that would find that LBA and Simpson were one in the same.
Read part one of the transcript
Read part two of the transcript
Leave a Comment » |
O.J. Simpson |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 17, 2010
The Goldman family was successful in obtaining an assignment of Mr. Simpson’s television and movie rights.
Read the order here.
As well as any payments from NFL Films
Leave a Comment » |
O.J. Simpson |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 17, 2010
In late 2006 the Goldman family sought the outright transfer and assignment of Mr. Simpson’s right of publicity. The court’s decision is posted below:
Read the Court’s Opinion Here
Leave a Comment » |
O.J. Simpson |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 17, 2010
The story of the publishing of the book, ‘If I Did It’ begins with the secret deal between O.J. Simpson and Harper Collins, the publisher of the book. Read the contract here.
Nancy Grace – ‘Fox Cancels O.J. Book, TV Interview’ originally aired 11/20/2006: Transcript
Nancy Grace – ‘Did O.J. Spend the Money’ originally aired 11/27/2006: Transcript
Nancy Grace – ‘Ron Goldman Sues O.J. Simpson Over Book Deal’ originally aired12/20/2006: Transcript
The Goldman family was then successful in obtaining an order dirtecting the sheriff to sell Mr. Simpson’s rights in the book.
Read the Application Here.
Read the Court’s Tentative Ruling Here.
Read the transcript of the court hearing
View the Order Here
View the Assignment Order and Restraining Order
On March 23, 2007, LBA attempted to stay the sale of the If I Did It book. Read the Transcript of the Hearing Here
Read the Order Declaring Lorraine Brooke Associates, Inc. A Surrogate of O.J. Simpson. (3/23/2007)
Nancy Grace – ‘O.J. Simpson Fights Book Auction Order’ originally aired 4/06/2007: Transcript
View the order denying a stay of the sheriff’s sale
Subsequently an Order Staying the Sale Was Entered
Leave a Comment » |
O.J. Simpson |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Originally published in The Federal Lawyer, February 2010. Reprinted with permission. Copyright The Federal Lawyer.
By David J. Cook
This article provides a field manual for dealing with a defendant or judgment debtor who fraudulently conveys assets in the face of a high dollar judgment.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Asset Protection, Creditor's Rights and Remedies, Fraudulent Conveyances, Writs of Attachment |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Originally published in Debt3, Vol 25, Issue No. 4 July/August 2010
By David J. Cook
Considering going into private practice by yourself or with others? This simple guide can help you discover gold – and not grief – during this wonderful quest.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Law Practice Management |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Originally Published in Debt3 Vol 25, Issue No. 5, September/October 2010
By David J. Cook
Being successful in cases that involve attachments.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Writs of Attachment |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Originally Published in Public Utilities Fort Nightly, March 1, 1995
By David J. Cook
Deregulation is a battle over metering relationships with commercial customers, not a struggle between competing suppliers of energy. As long as the local electric utility emerges from the process with exclusive control over its metering, credit, and billing relationships, then deregulation will only cement its position as the customer’s primary energy service provider \(em and further enhance the “pool” concept by which the local utility acts as agent for the retail customer to purchase energy from independent power producers (IPPs). This outcome will prevail even if regulators adopt retail wheeling.
Read the Full Article Here
Leave a Comment » |
Deregulation, Public Utilities |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Originally published in Business Credit, The Publication For Credit And Financial Professionals, June 1995.
By David J. Cook
Customers pay your bills with checks. These checks find their way through accounting departments, accounts receivable, cash posting, and sometimes, credit departments, for posting, reconciliation, and preparation for deposit. Checks are payable to your company and certainly not your employee(s) in every case. These checks, hopefully, find their way into your bank account.
Old Rules: Depositing Bank Usually Takes Loss
Your trusted employee, such as data processing, accounts receivable, or posting clerk steals a customer check. Who bears this loss? Under these facts we’ll apply the “old rules.” We have old and new rules, and this article tells you that the old rules don’t apply and the new rules do apply.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Fraud, Negotiable Instruments |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Originally published in Newspaper Financial Executives Quarterly, April, May, June 1995, Volume 1, Issue 3.
By David J. Cook
Let’s take a guided tour through Plans of Arrangements and Disclosure Statements in Chapter 11 proceedings. This exercise is important in evaluating benefits under any Chapter 11 for purposes of voting on the plan, financial reporting in evaluating write-offs and collectability, and furthermore evaluating offers from brokers and buyers of claims that were solicited in the Texaco, Macy’s, Emporium, Mega-Foods, and Liquor Barn cases. This tour will also identify pitfalls and follies of many Chapter 11 plans which sometimes produce only questionable benefits. Recent studies indicate that most confirmed Chapter 11s produce a paltry dividend averaging about $.10/dollar, and even confirmed Chapter 11s have a high rate of failure and default, foreclosing any likely recovery with further administrative expense.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Bankruptcy |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Plaintiff Magazine, January 2010
By David J. Cook
The damages exceed insurance limits, and the value of defendant’s real property value has risen but his liability insurance has not been kept up. A collection attorney looks at when and how to go after hard assets, how to bargain for them, and when to settle for the insurance policy limits.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Creditor's Rights and Remedies, Insurance |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Commercial Law League of America – The Free Press – Volume 6, Summer 2010
By David J. Cook
This article will survey common asset protection schemes prosecuted by a judgment debtor who face a substantial judgment and decline payment. In the face of post judgment remedies, the judgment debtor will transform assets by retitling the assets in the name of a surrogate entity but retain beneficial use. Asset protection strategies increase the expense of enforcement and drive away most creditors who decline to invest capital in unwinding complex or difficult transfers and abandon enforcement altogether. “Creditors have great difficulty in obtaining control over these assets because often times it is cost prohibitive for the creditor to domesticate the U.S. Judgment in the foreign jurisdiction. As a result, these creditors will often settle their claims for just a few pennies on the dollar.” 1 Asset protection diminishes the value of the judgment, and absent the most stout hearted and well heeled, most creditors would settle for a pittance than finance and face the rigors of year of post judgment fraudulent conveyance litigation.
This article is written in two parts: First what are basic asset protection strategies how to find assets, and second, how to unwind the transfers and achieve recompense.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Asset Protection |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Financial Fraud Law Report Volume 2 Number 9, October 2010
By David J. Cook
This article is the judgment creditor’s roadmap to recompense. This article focuses on, in particular, the California state court remedies available to a judgment creditor to ferret out information that will reveal the assets of a judgment debtor and thereby enable the judgment creditor to reach those assets in the process of satisfying the judgment, but many of the concepts discussed here are, of course, applicable across the country.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Asset Protection, Creditor's Rights and Remedies |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Journal of Legal Technology Risk Management, Fall 2010, Issue 5.1
By David J. Cook
As suggested in this article, pre-judgment remedies available to class action plaintiffs now assume greater importance. With provisional relief at hand, a plaintiff can assure him/herself of payment, accelerate the pace of litigation, and achieve an earlier final resolution than would be possible with ten (or even twenty) years of bitter and very expensive litigation. However, the necessity of showing exigent circumstances and posting a security equal to or in excess of the claim renders the pre-judgment attachment inaccessible.
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Class Actions, Pre-Judgment Remedies, Writs of Attachment |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Commercial Law League of America – The Free Press – Volume 7, Fall 2010
By David J. Cook
What is the rule in Shelly’s case? How about Twine’s case? How about the Rule Against Perpetuities? Do we remember these rules and apply them everyday?
What about the Law of Unintended Consequences? We should all
apply this rule in signing leases, and here is why.For an attorney in private practice, the Law of Unintended Consequences unifies every aspect of running a law office, large, medium and small. This Law focuses our attention to what we fear doing most of all: Signing your name to a business contract and learning later that you affixed your name to a very disastrous deal. You signed your name and what did you get?
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Law Practice Management, Lease Terms |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
DEBT3, Vol. 25, Issue No. 6, November/December 2010
By David J. Cook
An in-depth analysis of common contractural terms through the prism of hyper-expedited enforcement.
This article discusses how the drafter might inadvertently render the contract “sue and attachment proof,” favoring the buyer of product and probable debtor. The article also explains and explores contractual asset
protection fostered by the creditor (perfectly legal). The debtor will say, “Why commit a fraudulent conveyance, when I can hide behind the creditor’s own contract?
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Asset Protection, Contract Terms |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Financial Fraud Law Report, Volume 3 Number 1 January 2011
By David J. Cook
This article explores the scope of an attorney’s authority, if any, to endorse a client’s name to a settlement check and deposit the check in the attorney’s trust account. It also analyzes the bank’s liability to the client for conversion under the Uniform Commercial Code and the statute of limitations in these matters
Full Text
Leave a Comment » |
Financial Institution Liability, Fraud |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property – Volume 9, Number 3 (Fall 2010)
By David J. Cook
Post-Judgment Remedies in Reaching Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks in the Enforcement of A Money Judgment
http://www.law.northwestern.edu/journals/njtip/v9/n3/3/Cook.pdf
Leave a Comment » |
Seizure of Intellectual Property |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
Garza v. Asbestos Corporation Limited
In the case of Garza v. Asbestos Corporation Limited the judgment creditors sought enforcement of their California judgment in Quebec, Canada. While Quebec law prohibits the enforcement of a foreign judgment based on an asbestos claim, the judgment creditors were never the less able to obtain an assignment of the debtors rights to payment from nearly every bank in Canada. Furthermore, the judgment creditors where successful in compelling the judgment debtors to answer post-judgment discovery regarding the location of its assets.
The transcripts of the hearings in which these motions were heard offer a fascinating insight into the often uncharted territory of enforcement of U.S. judgments over international borders.
This case revolves around the ability of a judgment creditor to reach assets of the judgment debtor which are located off-shore. These facts unfortunately predominate in many mass tort or significant damage actions in which the perpetrator is domiciled off shore. typically these fact patterns reveal that the off shore manufacturer has put into commerce dangerous or defective goods which kill maim or injure. As expected American consumers suffer greatly in that these products cause unbelievable losses. Lawsuits and big judgments follow.
The off-shore manufacturer routinely ignore legal process leading to multi-million dollar default judgments and thereby leading to a massive campaign initiated by the judgment creditors to collect these judgments. This case provides for a linear stream of orders which illustrates the power of the court to issue orders for the assignment of rights and orders compelling discovery.
Transcripts:
1. Hearing re: assignment of rights – October 28, 2010
2. Hearing re: Motion to compel answers to discover requests, November 23, 2010
3. Hearing re: assignment of rights – December 1, 2010
Orders:
1. Order Compelling Discovery Responses – 11/23/2010
2. Assignment Order (Five Banks)
3. Assignment Order – All Banks
Leave a Comment » |
International Enforcement of Judgments, Offshore Enforcement |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter
December 16, 2010
In Sanfer Sports Cars v. Shisler, the judgment creditor levied on several of the judgment debtor’s automobiles. In an effort to mask the ownership of the automobiles the judgment debtor had previously attempted to transfer title to each of the automobiles his parents, who then filed a third party claim.
This case is instructive for a host of reasons. The judgment creditor sought and received extensive post judgment orders to gain access to the cars, pink slips, keys to the car (mailed from Italy), orders for the fraudulent conveyees to appear for an examination, restraining orders, and an order setting the third party claim. These orders are extremely extensive in their scope and breath and serve as a virtual carousel of post-judgment remedies.
The irony is that the judgment debtor filed a petition under Chapter 13, and the schedules are likewise uploaded. while the filing of the chapter 13 is unremarkable, and clearly the exercise of the judgment debtor’s constitutional rights, the judgment debtor sought to assert a claim of exemption of the vehicles in Schedule C. This comes as no surprise. As a matter of California law a fraudulent conveyor cannot unwind a fraudulent conveyance as the conveyance between the conveyor and the conveyee is absolute and only subject to attack in favor of a creditor. Whether or not that exemption stands or fails is for another day.
Tune in.
The following order denied the third party claim of the judgment debtor’s parents and awarded the automobiles to the judgment creditor:
Sanfer Sports Cars v. Shisler Sister State Judgment and 3rd Party Claim – Part I
Sanfer Sports Cars v. Shisler – Third Party Claim Part II
OEX of Brian Shisler
OEX of Dee Shisler
OEX of Isabel Shisler
Sanfer Sports Cars v. Shisler – Third Party Claim Order
Leave a Comment » |
Orders, Third Party Claims |
Permalink
Posted by collectionlawreporter